Photographers keep facing more and more questions and charges for breaking the law, making it important now so more than ever to understand your rights and responsibilities as a photographer. In this article, we’ll go over such rights, as well as Model Releases.
Where and What can I photograph?
The general rule is that you can photograph mostly anything you like as long as it’s in a public place. You do not need to have permission to photograph in public, this include photographing building and parks as well as people that are in public areas.
If you’re on public property you can even photograph private property, for example standing on the street and photographing someone’s garden. If you are on private property you can photograph until someone ask you to stop (a sign prohibiting photography counts as well) and you must obey such a request.
There are exceptions to this rule, for example military installations or other subjects that can be classed as national security. However infrastructures such as bridges are not included in such a list. Another exception is, even in a public space, places like dressing rooms, restrooms or people entering their code at the ATM machine — photographing at these places counts as invading a person’s privacy.
So to summarize, here are some examples of things you can photograph, if you’re in a public space you can photograph adults, children, law enforcement officers, accidents, criminal activities, celebrities, airports and train stations.
What to do when people question you
There is a good chance that somewhere along the way in your photography experience, someone is going to confront you. Everything from regular citizens to security personal and law enforcement officers might question your activity and ask you to stop photographing. They might say it’s for security reason and refer to acts like terrorism, this is not a valid reason for them to ask you to stop what you are doing. As long as you’re in a public space you have the right to photograph.
First of all, act politely and stay as calm as possible. You do not need to explain why you are there or what you are photographing. In most cases you do not need to disclose your identity (depending on your country/state you might need to do so if it’s a law enforcement officer that is requesting).
You do not need to give them your camera/memory card nor do you need to delete the images. Unless they have a court order or are arresting you (again, depending on your location) they have no right to take your equipment.
If you are asked to delete photographs or asked to hand over your equipment ask for their identity and who they work for. Also ask what legal reason they cite for doing this to you. If this happens to you, you might want to consider taking legal action or contact your local newspaper.
How and Where can I use/publish my photographs?
Okay, so you have the right to photograph mostly anything, but are you allowed to do whatever you want with the photographs you took? The short answer is: No, there are rules and laws surrounding how you publish and distribute your photographs.
Once again, I cannot stress this enough, the laws are not the same all around the world so make sure you know what the laws says in your area before you do something you will later regret. A wrong decision can end up costing you a lot of money, not to mention your reputation as a respectable photographer.
In most areas the main difference in your rights is depending on if the photograph is used commercially or not. If your photograph is not commercial, i.e. considered art, you have much more rights to publish and use your photograph. For example, in most countries you are allowed to publish and sell photographs that are considered art without a legal release from the model/person in the photo. This means that you can go around the city photographing people in everyday situations and sell the prints or have a show at a gallery without notifying the people you photograph.
However if you intend to use the photograph in any commercial situation you will need a model release from the model. An important note is that if you sell the photograph to a commercial agency they are responsible for getting the model release from both the model and you as the photographer. If they publish your photograph without a model release you are not to blame — however all serious agencies requires a model release for every photograph they buy.
There is one gray spot though, photographers portfolios. They are used to display your work, just like commercials, but in most countries they are considered art and you do not need a model release to publish a photo on your portfolio.
News photographs, even though they can be used to sell newspapers, do not require a model release to be published and sold.
As you can see this is a rather complex issue, and I haven’t even talked about how different it is from country to country, so it’s important that you check this yourself before doing a job.
Model release
I’ve talked quite a lot about model release, which is a form of a legal document that basically states that you as a photographer holds the rights to the photograph and can do what you want with it. These legal releases can be made very simple or they can be quite detailed; in most cases a simple one will do just fine. Before doing a large-scale job, contacting a lawyer will be well worth the money to avoid any legal problems later on.
I have designed two different samples of model releases, which could be used as a guide to what you might need/want. These samples are not intended for actual use, they are supplied as guides and should be used as such.
The first one is a standard model release to be used when photographing a model for commercial use. It gives the photographer complete rights to the photographs.
The second one is a specific model release for a type of modeling that is becoming more and more common, Time-For-Print. Time-For-Print is the idea that the model gives you his/her time and for that they receive an agreed upon amount of prints for compensation. This is common for models starting out and wanting to build up a portfolio and for photographers doing the same thing. This model release is more flexible and gives options on what compensation the model is expected to receive.
If you’re doing a planned photography session with people; models, weddings, children etc. always have them sign a model release. It’s for your own safety! Do not just throw the paper on the counter and force them to sign it, it’s important that they understand what they are signing and explain what it is. They are signing away their rights to the photograph of themselves or their children; it’s understandably that they might have some questions or concerns so you should be thorough.
I am not a lawyer and this text should not be seen as legal advice. If you need legal advice contact a local lawyer whom have knowledge in this field.
Laws are different from country to country and even state-to-state, so contact a lawyer or local law enforcement office for specific laws in your area. Another good advice is to contact a local newspaper, they often have good knowledge what photography related laws are in place in the area they work in.
Free Goodies. Delivered to You.
Subscribe to Tutorial9, and we'll deliver you the newest freebies and tutorials for free.
Subscribe By Email Subscribe By RSSWrite for Tutorial9
- Do you want to get paid $150 for writing at Tutorial9?
- Are you a talented Photoshopper, Blogger, or Photographer?
- Want to help thousands of others by sharing your knowledge?
If so, we're interested in you, and we'll pay you. Find out how to write for Tutorial9.






99 Comments Leave a Comment
I’m sure a lot of photographers will get great benefit from this post. I’ll be sending this to a few of my friends as well. Thanks.
Just wondering….if I take pictures of a live show (band, singer etc.) in a public place, do I need a release from the band members to post the pics to my web site or netwok site for display / portfolio use or competition. Not planning on selling the photos.
Yes I would like to know that too.. if you photo at a nightclub can the club use those photos?
An open air concert, regarded as public property shooting, should be ok (check the local laws!!!) but a club, is considered private property, so you would definetly have to ask permission. Usually club managers or owners have no problem, they WANT photos to show up of people, having a good time in their establishments.
A most excellent article!
Thank You,
Tony
Hi, if photos were taken of me while I acted in a play, can they be sold by the photographer without my permission?
Thanks!
In most cases, it would be illegal for them to do that.
thanks that really helps.being amateur photographer i guess i faced so many red signals than may be any professional would have.and yes the rules do vary from country to country.
thanks
This was VERY helpful information.
Thanks for the info.
Although I have been escorted off a public bridge in Sydney by security, supposedly there were some new anti-terrorist laws brough in after 9/11… and photographing a “structure” such as a bridge was a “security threat”
Hey Sam, as I said in the article, the laws are different from country to country and I don’t have much knowledge about those specific laws in Australia. It does however not sound right (but often happens since 9/11).
Read through http://www.4020.net/words/photorights.php if you’re interested, it’s a very detailed and long articles on the specific laws surrounding photography in Australia. I didn’t read the whole article, but from what I can see, it might be different depending on what bridge you were at (and if it’s for commercial or not etc).
Also, a quick side note, somewhat serious and somewhat comedic… check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McB9tsabPn0
terror in Sydney? well that makes me laugh. Maybe those security guards should take a trip to NYC. I too was once advised not to photograph from Brooklyn bridge for same reason and again I laughed then. The whole hysteria goes nuts but I just hope some time in the future, it will stop.
thanks for this important information
u have learned me what i don’t know
thanks it is very useful
*I am going to photograph a very large bike and running race that has a sponsor.
*I want to put these photos of the races on my website to sell for a profit.
*I have specifically emphasized, on my website, that my photography is not to be used for commercial purposes, only for personal use.
*By not selling for commercial use, am I protected legally?
*Does selling my photos of the event infringe on the rights of the organizer who hires a photographer and also sells photos of the event on their website?
*If I sell photos of adults and children attending the public event, as well as racers, can I sell them without a model release, or other kind of release?
*I have checked with the Forest Service and they say I can take still photos on FS lands the races go through, and I can sell them. They say the necessity of a permit only refers to filming.
Great tips that every photographer should know. Thanks!
Just added this to my best links of the week: http://printedproof.com/wicked-good-week/wicked-good-week-september-11/
This article doesn’t mention “work for hire”. It’s worth looking into if you plan on doing commercial work or any work at the behest of someone else. The rules of who owns the copyright in the work are very specific.
Of course, this applies to US law. YMMV.
So if there are photograph anyone in a public park, including children as long as I don’t plan on publishing them without a release? Is there somewhere that states this legally? I have been told very harshly i am wrong and can not include children even if they are in public.
“So if there are photograph anyone in a public park” Im even confused by that last statement! I meant So, I can photograph anyone in a public Park…..
Thank for information about Rights as a Photographer. Became a professional photographer this information help me a lot. Thanks for sharing this nice post.
Thanks for the article useful
How abut photographing in a high school, for the school newspaper? The police gave a student a hard time and confiscated the camera.
Thank you for good information
if a verbal agreement was made between the model, designer, make-up artist, cosmetologist, and photographer to offer their services in exchange for the photos to be made accessible to all parties; does the photographer have the right to withhold the photos. No release forms were signed. the photographer, designer, and model are students, and the make-up artist and cosmetologist are licensed professionals.
I’m just wondering– I did a photo shoot with a family a while back, the mom was one of my best friends and said — didnt sign anything– that I could use the photos on my website.
She’s a fellow photographer and the reason we are not friends now is that we got into an argument about a shoot we’d done– she’d put some photos up on her on gallery facebook from the shoot without getting a model release first, and she swore it was okay because she owned them as the photographer, and I wasn’t too clear on that.
When we parted ways, she demanded I take down the pictures of her and her family because SHE owned them, even though, following her logic, I am the photographer and therefore owned them.
Who’s right here? I’d like to know if I can use the photos on my website, mostly, since that was her logic and it didn’t matter to her that this other family cared.
Any info is appreciated!
if you took the photos with your own equipment, they belong to you. however, that you have had conflict w/ this other photographer and she has requested you remove them, then removing them would be the right thing to do. recreate the images with another client to avoid further conflict. …just my personal and professional opinion.
this helps a lot i am making a portfolio and i am trying to find out all my legal rights before i publish it….thanks
this helps a lot i am making a portfolio and i am trying to find out all my legal rights before i publish it….thanks
I want to take a picture of a crowded street to sell for profit, do I still need model releases?
So if there are photograph anyone in a public park, including children as long as I don’t plan on publishing them without a release? Is there somewhere that states this legally?
To DeAnna,
You could always blur your former friends face out. My understanding is (i am not a lawyer but had a semester of it in college)… If you photography non-celebrities and want to earn a profit from them you need a release form. If you photograph celebrities you do not need a release form provided the photos do not imply an endorsement of a product or service.
Very useful article, also the PDFs for downloading are quite handy. I will re-tweet it definitely. Thanks!
As a professional photographer, I face this question very often. This article writes some basic logics quite clearly.
Once again it is NOT what you photograph But what you are going to use it for. You should remember, no matter how you are logically right, a problem arise when someone says it’s a problem. Better avoid them by all means. Do not use them, It’s a waste of time and just move on to your next step.
(of course the best would be getting documents signed in the beginning.)
Great reading! Thanks for sharing
Not planning on selling the photos Thank